Luxembourg vs Sao Tome and Principe: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Luxembourg
32.6%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
32.1%
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
162nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
164th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Luxembourg
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 32.6% against 32.1% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 162nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th of 191 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.3% | 10.3% | 21.9% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 28.5% | 4.0% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Luxembourg or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Luxembourg, at 32.6% against 32.1% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Luxembourg and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.5%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Luxembourg and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Luxembourg ranks 162nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.