Republic of Moldova vs Uzbekistan: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Republic of Moldova
93.3%
in 2019
Uzbekistan
95.1%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
27th
Uzbekistan rank
25th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 95.1% against 93.3% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.4% | 48.6% | 41.8% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 92.1% | 89.0% | 3.1% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Republic of Moldova or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 95.1% against 93.3% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan?
- 1.8%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Uzbekistan rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 25th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.