Montenegro vs Palestine, State of: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Montenegro
79.0%
in 2019
Palestine, State of
79.8%
in 2019
Montenegro rank
62nd
Palestine, State of rank
59th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 79.8% against 79.0% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 62nd and Palestine, State of ranks 59th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.1% | 91.9% | 10.8% | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 78.9% | 82.3% | 3.4% | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Montenegro or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 79.8% against 79.0% in Montenegro as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Montenegro and Palestine, State of?
- 0.8%, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Palestine, State of?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Montenegro and Palestine, State of rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 62nd and Palestine, State of ranks 59th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.