Nigeria vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Nigeria
24.8%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
27.1%
in 2019
Nigeria rank
170th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
167th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Nigeria
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 27.1% against 24.8% in Nigeria, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Nigeria ranks 170th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 167th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 11.8% | 11.8% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 13.3% | 18.5% | 5.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Nigeria or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 27.1% against 24.8% in Nigeria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Nigeria and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 2.3%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Nigeria and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Nigeria ranks 170th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 167th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.