Papua New Guinea vs Tanzania: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Papua New Guinea
65.6%
in 2019
Tanzania
65.5%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
104th
Tanzania rank
105th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Tanzania
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 65.6% against 65.5% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 104th and Tanzania ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.8% | 67.1% | 1.4% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 65.8% | 68.9% | 3.2% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Papua New Guinea or Tanzania?
- Papua New Guinea, at 65.6% against 65.5% in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Papua New Guinea and Tanzania?
- 0.1%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Tanzania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Tanzania rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 104th and Tanzania ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.