Sao Tome and Principe vs Zambia: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
32.1%
in 2019
Zambia
36.5%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
164th
Zambia rank
161st
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 36.5% against 32.1% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Zambia ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.4% | 42.6% | 34.2% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 28.5% | 33.9% | 5.4% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 36.5% against 32.1% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
- 4.4%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Zambia rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 161st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.