Switzerland vs United Arab Emirates: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Switzerland
98.3%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
98.8%
in 2019
Switzerland rank
15th
United Arab Emirates rank
13th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Switzerland
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 98.8% against 98.3% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Switzerland ahead.
Switzerland ranks 15th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 191 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Switzerland | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.7% | 85.4% | 11.4% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 98.3% | 94.4% | 3.9% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Switzerland or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 98.8% against 98.3% in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Switzerland and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.5%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and United Arab Emirates?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Switzerland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Switzerland ranks 15th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.