Lithuania vs Viet Nam: Registering property: Cost
Registering property: Cost over time
- Lithuania
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.8% against 0.6% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 162nd and Viet Nam ranks 164th of 187 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.7% | 1.2% | 0.5% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.2% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost, Lithuania or Viet Nam?
- Lithuania, at 0.8% against 0.6% in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost between Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 0.2%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Viet Nam rank globally for registering property: cost?
- Lithuania ranks 162nd and Viet Nam ranks 164th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost is the total of official costs associated with completing the procedures to transfer the property, expressed as a percentage of the property value, assumed to be equivalent to 50 times income per capita. It is calculted as a percentage of the property value. Only official costs required by law are recorded, including fees, transfer taxes, stamp duties and any other payment to the property registry, notaries, public agencies or lawyers. Other taxes, such as capital gains tax or value added tax, are excluded from the cost measure. Both costs borne by the buyer and the seller are included. If cost estimates differ among sources, the median reported value is used.