Afghanistan vs Micronesia (country): Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 33.33 against 0 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 33.33.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 178th and Micronesia (country) ranks 181st of 183 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.22 | 0 | 27.22 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 0 | 33.33 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Micronesia (country)?
- Afghanistan, at 33.33 against 0 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Micronesia (country)?
- 33.33, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Micronesia (country)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Micronesia (country) rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 178th and Micronesia (country) ranks 181st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.