Albania vs Philippines: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Albania
63.45
in 2014
Philippines
62.81
in 2014
Albania rank
102nd
Philippines rank
105th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Albania
  • Philippines
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Albania currently reports 63.45 against 62.81 in Philippines, a difference of 0.64.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Philippines ahead.

Albania ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 105th of 181 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 47.17 62.82 15.65 Philippines
2010s 56.23 62.74 6.51 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Albania or Philippines?
Albania, at 63.45 against 62.81 in Philippines as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Albania and Philippines?
0.64, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Philippines?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Albania and Philippines rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Albania ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 105th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.