Algeria vs Angola: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Algeria
50.67
in 2014
Angola
49.3
in 2014
Algeria rank
150th
Angola rank
153rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Algeria
  • Angola
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 50.67 against 49.3 in Angola, a difference of 1.37.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 150th and Angola ranks 153rd of 181 countries.

Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Angola Difference Ahead
2000s 40.4 27.4 13 Algeria
2010s 50.63 46.35 4.29 Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Algeria or Angola?
Algeria, at 50.67 against 49.3 in Angola as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Algeria and Angola?
1.37, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Angola?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Algeria and Angola rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Algeria ranks 150th and Angola ranks 153rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.