Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Angola
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Angola currently reports 49.3 against 48.66 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.64.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Angola ranks 156th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 184 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.4 | 42.21 | 14.81 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 46.35 | 47.98 | 1.64 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Angola or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Angola, at 49.3 against 48.66 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.64, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Angola ranks 156th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.