Angola vs Trinidad and Tobago: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Angola
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 50 against 49.3 in Angola, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Angola ranks 156th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 155th of 184 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.51 | 44.24 | 16.74 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 46.35 | 47.7 | 1.35 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Angola or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 50 against 49.3 in Angola as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Angola and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.7, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Angola ranks 156th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 155th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.