Antigua and Barbuda vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 55.44 against 55.39 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.05.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 140th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.38 | 42.57 | 14.81 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 55.38 | 51.77 | 3.6 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 55.44 against 55.39 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0.05, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 140th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.