Antigua and Barbuda vs Equatorial Guinea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 55.44 against 54.82 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.62.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 139th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.38 | 54.82 | 2.55 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 55.38 | 54.82 | 0.5568 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Equatorial Guinea?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 55.44 against 54.82 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.62, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 139th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.