Antigua and Barbuda vs Kiribati: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 55.48 against 55.44 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 137th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.38 | 55.46 | 1.91 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 55.38 | 55.48 | 0.1039 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 55.48 against 55.44 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Kiribati?
- 0.04, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Kiribati?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Kiribati rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 137th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.