Argentina vs Guinea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Argentina
60.63
in 2014
Guinea
60.14
in 2014
Argentina rank
112th
Guinea rank
114th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Argentina
  • Guinea
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 60.63 against 60.14 in Guinea, a difference of 0.49.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 112th and Guinea ranks 114th of 181 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 63.86 44.84 19.03 Argentina
2010s 60.68 50.55 10.13 Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Argentina or Guinea?
Argentina, at 60.63 against 60.14 in Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Argentina and Guinea?
0.49, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guinea?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Argentina and Guinea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Argentina ranks 112th and Guinea ranks 114th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.