Armenia vs Norway: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Armenia
93.12
in 2014
Norway
94.12
in 2014
Armenia rank
6th
Norway rank
4th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Armenia
  • Norway
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Norway currently reports 94.12 against 93.12 in Armenia, a difference of 1.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 6th and Norway ranks 4th of 181 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 91.94 94.27 2.33 Norway
2010s 93.01 94.12 1.11 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Armenia or Norway?
Norway, at 94.12 against 93.12 in Armenia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Armenia and Norway?
1, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Norway?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Armenia and Norway rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Armenia ranks 6th and Norway ranks 4th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.