Australia vs Czechia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 78.06 against 76.87 in Australia, a difference of 1.19.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 50th and Czechia ranks 48th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.63 | 63.79 | 12.84 | Australia |
| 2010s | 77.09 | 78.35 | 1.25 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Australia or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 78.06 against 76.87 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Australia and Czechia?
- 1.19, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Czechia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Czechia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 50th and Czechia ranks 48th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.