Austria vs Canada: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Austria
81.07
in 2014
Canada
81.88
in 2014
Austria rank
30th
Canada rank
27th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Austria
  • Canada
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Canada currently reports 81.88 against 81.07 in Austria, a difference of 0.81.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 30th and Canada ranks 27th of 181 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Canada Difference Ahead
2000s 79.54 84.61 5.07 Canada
2010s 81.12 82.89 1.78 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Austria or Canada?
Canada, at 81.88 against 81.07 in Austria as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Austria and Canada?
0.81, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Canada?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Austria and Canada rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Austria ranks 30th and Canada ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.