Austria vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Austria currently reports 81.07 against 80.53 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Austria ranks 30th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.54 | 80.19 | 0.6478 | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 81.12 | 78.01 | 3.1 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Austria or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Austria, at 81.07 against 80.53 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Austria and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0.54, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 30th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.