Austria vs Taiwan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Austria
81.07
in 2014
Taiwan
80.19
in 2014
Austria rank
30th
Taiwan rank
33rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Austria
  • Taiwan
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Austria currently reports 81.07 against 80.19 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.88.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Taiwan ahead.

Austria ranks 30th and Taiwan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 79.54 80.08 0.5412 Taiwan
2010s 81.12 80.19 0.9297 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Austria or Taiwan?
Austria, at 81.07 against 80.19 in Taiwan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Austria and Taiwan?
0.88, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Taiwan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Austria and Taiwan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Austria ranks 30th and Taiwan ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.