Azerbaijan vs Lithuania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Azerbaijan
92.86
in 2014
Lithuania
92.23
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
7th
Lithuania rank
9th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Lithuania
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 92.86 against 92.23 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.63.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lithuania ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 79.89 90.13 10.24 Lithuania
2010s 92.57 92.2 0.3627 Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Lithuania?
Azerbaijan, at 92.86 against 92.23 in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
0.63, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Lithuania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan and Lithuania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.