Azerbaijan vs Slovak Republic: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 92.86 against 91.95 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.91.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 7th and Slovak Republic ranks 10th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.89 | 89.64 | 9.74 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 92.57 | 91.95 | 0.6201 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Slovak Republic?
- Azerbaijan, at 92.86 against 91.95 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Slovak Republic?
- 0.91, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Slovak Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and Slovak Republic rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 7th and Slovak Republic ranks 10th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.