Bahrain vs Russia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Bahrain
88.65
in 2014
Russia
88.18
in 2014
Bahrain rank
16th
Russia rank
18th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • Russia
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 88.65 against 88.18 in Russia, a difference of 0.47.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Bahrain has been ahead every year.

Bahrain ranks 16th and Russia ranks 18th of 181 countries.

Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Russia Difference Ahead
2000s 90.43 75.21 15.22 Bahrain
2010s 86.87 81.42 5.46 Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bahrain or Russia?
Bahrain, at 88.65 against 88.18 in Russia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bahrain and Russia?
0.47, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Russia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Russia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Bahrain ranks 16th and Russia ranks 18th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.