Bahrain vs Saudi Arabia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Bahrain
88.65
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
87.77
in 2014
Bahrain rank
16th
Saudi Arabia rank
19th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • Saudi Arabia
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 88.65 against 87.77 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.88.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 19th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 90.43 87.77 2.66 Bahrain
2010s 86.87 87.77 0.8986 Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bahrain or Saudi Arabia?
Bahrain, at 88.65 against 87.77 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bahrain and Saudi Arabia?
0.88, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Saudi Arabia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Saudi Arabia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Bahrain ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 19th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.