Bangladesh vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 31.09 against 0 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 31.09.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 179th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 181st of 183 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.21 | 0 | 24.21 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 30.93 | 0 | 30.93 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bangladesh or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Bangladesh, at 31.09 against 0 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bangladesh and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 31.09, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Bangladesh and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 179th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 181st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.