Belarus vs Estonia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Belarus
90.8
in 2014
Estonia
90.88
in 2014
Belarus rank
12th
Estonia rank
11th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Estonia
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 90.88 against 90.8 in Belarus, a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Estonia ahead.

Belarus ranks 12th and Estonia ranks 11th of 181 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Estonia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.52 86.15 28.63 Estonia
2010s 89.5 90.73 1.23 Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Belarus or Estonia?
Estonia, at 90.88 against 90.8 in Belarus as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Belarus and Estonia?
0.08, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Estonia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Estonia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Belarus ranks 12th and Estonia ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.