Belarus vs Rwanda: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Belarus
90.8
in 2014
Rwanda
89.2
in 2014
Belarus rank
12th
Rwanda rank
14th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Rwanda
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 90.8 against 89.2 in Rwanda, a difference of 1.6.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 181 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 57.52 45.13 12.39 Belarus
2010s 89.5 78.89 10.62 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Belarus or Rwanda?
Belarus, at 90.8 against 89.2 in Rwanda as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Belarus and Rwanda?
1.6, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Rwanda?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Rwanda rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Belarus ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.