Belarus vs Switzerland: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Belarus
90.8
in 2014
Switzerland
88.71
in 2014
Belarus rank
12th
Switzerland rank
15th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Switzerland
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 90.8 against 88.71 in Switzerland, a difference of 2.09.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Switzerland ahead.

Belarus ranks 12th and Switzerland ranks 15th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 57.52 88.19 30.67 Switzerland
2010s 89.5 88.71 0.795 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Belarus or Switzerland?
Belarus, at 90.8 against 88.71 in Switzerland as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Belarus and Switzerland?
2.09, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Switzerland?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Switzerland rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Belarus ranks 12th and Switzerland ranks 15th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.