Belgium vs Namibia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Belgium
42.24
in 2014
Namibia
41.61
in 2014
Belgium rank
166th
Namibia rank
168th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Namibia
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 42.24 against 41.61 in Namibia, a difference of 0.63.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Namibia ahead.

Belgium ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 35.58 56.22 20.64 Namibia
2010s 41.75 47 5.25 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Belgium or Namibia?
Belgium, at 42.24 against 41.61 in Namibia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Belgium and Namibia?
0.63, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Namibia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Belgium and Namibia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Belgium ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.