Bhutan vs Montenegro: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Bhutan
68.82
in 2014
Montenegro
68.2
in 2014
Bhutan rank
81st
Montenegro rank
83rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Montenegro
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 68.82 against 68.2 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.62.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 81st and Montenegro ranks 83rd of 181 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 68.82 66.03 2.79 Bhutan
2010s 68.82 66.43 2.39 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Montenegro?
Bhutan, at 68.82 against 68.2 in Montenegro as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Montenegro?
0.62, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Montenegro?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Montenegro rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Bhutan ranks 81st and Montenegro ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.