Bhutan vs Tunisia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Bhutan
68.82
in 2014
Tunisia
69.12
in 2014
Bhutan rank
81st
Tunisia rank
79th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Tunisia
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 69.12 against 68.82 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.3.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 81st and Tunisia ranks 79th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 68.82 68.3 0.5157 Bhutan
2010s 68.82 69.08 0.2603 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 69.12 against 68.82 in Bhutan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Tunisia?
0.3, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tunisia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Bhutan and Tunisia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Bhutan ranks 81st and Tunisia ranks 79th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.