Bolivia vs Eswatini: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Bolivia
58.71
in 2014
Eswatini
58.78
in 2014
Bolivia rank
122nd
Eswatini rank
121st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bolivia
  • Eswatini
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 58.78 against 58.71 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.07.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 121st of 181 countries.

Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 58.03 55.19 2.83 Bolivia
2010s 58.47 58.12 0.3407 Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bolivia or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 58.78 against 58.71 in Bolivia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bolivia and Eswatini?
0.07, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Eswatini?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bolivia and Eswatini rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Bolivia ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.