Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mozambique: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Mozambique
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 68.12 against 67.19 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.93.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mozambique ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.87 | 55.78 | 11.91 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 67.5 | 61.06 | 6.44 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mozambique?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 68.12 against 67.19 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique?
- 0.93, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mozambique rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.