Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Palestine, State of: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 68.54 against 68.12 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.42.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Palestine, State of ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.87 | 70.31 | 26.44 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 67.5 | 69.67 | 2.17 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 68.54 against 68.12 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine, State of?
- 0.42, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine, State of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine, State of rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Palestine, State of ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.