Botswana vs Singapore: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Botswana
78.6
in 2014
Singapore
79.22
in 2014
Botswana rank
39th
Singapore rank
37th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Singapore
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 79.22 against 78.6 in Botswana, a difference of 0.62.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Singapore ahead.

Botswana ranks 39th and Singapore ranks 37th of 181 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 81.38 79.75 1.63 Botswana
2010s 78.68 77.87 0.8075 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Botswana or Singapore?
Singapore, at 79.22 against 78.6 in Botswana as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Botswana and Singapore?
0.62, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Singapore?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Botswana and Singapore rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Botswana ranks 39th and Singapore ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.