Brazil vs France: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Brazil
56.19
in 2014
France
56.97
in 2014
Brazil rank
134th
France rank
131st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • France
0204060200420092014

How they compare

France currently reports 56.97 against 56.19 in Brazil, a difference of 0.78.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 134th and France ranks 131st of 181 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil France Difference Ahead
2000s 56.17 40.88 15.29 Brazil
2010s 56.63 55.7 0.9326 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Brazil or France?
France, at 56.97 against 56.19 in Brazil as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Brazil and France?
0.78, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and France?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Brazil and France rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Brazil ranks 134th and France ranks 131st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.