Brunei Darussalam vs Congo, Rep.: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Congo, Rep.
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 48.65 against 47.1 in Congo, Rep., a difference of 1.55.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 155th and Congo, Rep. ranks 158th of 181 countries.
Congo, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Congo, Rep. | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.87 | 51.27 | 5.39 | Congo, Rep. |
| 2010s | 48.38 | 49.12 | 0.7419 | Congo, Rep. |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Congo, Rep.?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 48.65 against 47.1 in Congo, Rep. as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Congo, Rep.?
- 1.55, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Congo, Rep.?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Congo, Rep. rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 155th and Congo, Rep. ranks 158th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.