Bulgaria vs South Korea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Bulgaria
71.13
in 2014
South Korea
70.99
in 2014
Bulgaria rank
70th
South Korea rank
73rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bulgaria
  • South Korea
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 71.13 against 70.99 in South Korea, a difference of 0.14.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 70th and South Korea ranks 73rd of 181 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 71.24 70.22 1.03 Bulgaria
2010s 71.09 70.72 0.3712 Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Bulgaria or South Korea?
Bulgaria, at 71.13 against 70.99 in South Korea as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Bulgaria and South Korea?
0.14, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and South Korea?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Bulgaria and South Korea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Bulgaria ranks 70th and South Korea ranks 73rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.