Burkina Faso vs Central African Republic: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 53.79 against 52.46 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 145th and Central African Republic ranks 147th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Central African Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.69 | 43.75 | 17.07 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 53.1 | 50.79 | 2.31 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Central African Republic?
- Burkina Faso, at 53.79 against 52.46 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
- 1.33, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Central African Republic rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 145th and Central African Republic ranks 147th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.