Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 54.82 against 53.79 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1.03.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 145th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 142nd of 184 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.35 | 54.82 | 26.47 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 53.1 | 54.82 | 1.72 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Burkina Faso or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 54.82 against 53.79 in Burkina Faso as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.03, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 145th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 142nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.