Burundi vs Czechia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Burundi
78.38
in 2014
Czechia
78.06
in 2014
Burundi rank
44th
Czechia rank
46th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Burundi
  • Czechia
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 78.38 against 78.06 in Czechia, a difference of 0.32.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Czechia ahead.

Burundi ranks 44th and Czechia ranks 46th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s 43.1 63.79 20.68 Czechia
2010s 66.98 78.35 11.37 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Burundi or Czechia?
Burundi, at 78.38 against 78.06 in Czechia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Burundi and Czechia?
0.32, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Czechia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Burundi and Czechia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Burundi ranks 44th and Czechia ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.