Cape Verde vs China: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cape Verde
74.5
in 2014
China
74.42
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
57th
China rank
58th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • China
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 74.5 against 74.42 in China, a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 57th and China ranks 58th of 181 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde China Difference Ahead
2000s 56.46 72.3 15.84 China
2010s 72.16 73.24 1.08 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cape Verde or China?
Cape Verde, at 74.5 against 74.42 in China as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cape Verde and China?
0.08, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and China?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cape Verde and China rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cape Verde ranks 57th and China ranks 58th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.