Cabo Verde vs Fiji: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cabo Verde
74.5
in 2014
Fiji
74.15
in 2014
Cabo Verde rank
57th
Fiji rank
59th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Fiji
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 74.5 against 74.15 in Fiji, a difference of 0.35.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 57th and Fiji ranks 59th of 181 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Fiji Difference Ahead
2000s 56.46 79.28 22.82 Fiji
2010s 72.16 76.65 4.49 Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cabo Verde or Fiji?
Cabo Verde, at 74.5 against 74.15 in Fiji as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cabo Verde and Fiji?
0.35, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Fiji?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cabo Verde and Fiji rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cabo Verde ranks 57th and Fiji ranks 59th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.