Cambodia vs Comoros: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cambodia
64.83
in 2014
Comoros
63.83
in 2014
Cambodia rank
97th
Comoros rank
100th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Comoros
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 64.83 against 63.83 in Comoros, a difference of 1.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 97th and Comoros ranks 100th of 181 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Comoros Difference Ahead
2000s 64.6 53.71 10.89 Cambodia
2010s 64.94 59.74 5.2 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Comoros?
Cambodia, at 64.83 against 63.83 in Comoros as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Comoros?
1, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Comoros?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Comoros rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cambodia ranks 97th and Comoros ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.