Central African Republic vs Dominica: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 52.86 against 52.46 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.4.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 146th and Dominica ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 51.84 | 8.08 | Dominica |
| 2010s | 50.79 | 52.69 | 1.91 | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 52.86 against 52.46 in Central African Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Dominica?
- 0.4, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Dominica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Dominica rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 146th and Dominica ranks 145th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.