Central African Republic vs Kenya: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Central African Republic
52.46
in 2014
Kenya
52.29
in 2014
Central African Republic rank
145th
Kenya rank
146th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Kenya
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 52.46 against 52.29 in Kenya, a difference of 0.17.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kenya ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 145th and Kenya ranks 146th of 181 groups.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 43.75 54.91 11.15 Kenya
2010s 50.79 53.81 3.03 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Kenya?
Central African Republic, at 52.46 against 52.29 in Kenya as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Kenya?
0.17, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Kenya?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Central African Republic and Kenya rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Central African Republic ranks 145th and Kenya ranks 146th of 181 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.