Central African Republic vs Zambia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Zambia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 52.46 against 51.75 in Zambia, a difference of 0.71.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Zambia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 146th and Zambia ranks 148th of 183 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 57.13 | 13.38 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 50.79 | 61.77 | 10.98 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Zambia?
- Central African Republic, at 52.46 against 51.75 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Zambia?
- 0.71, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Zambia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 146th and Zambia ranks 148th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.