Chad vs Maldives: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Chad
45.92
in 2014
Maldives
43.85
in 2014
Chad rank
161st
Maldives rank
164th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Chad
  • Maldives
01020304050200420092014

How they compare

Chad currently reports 45.92 against 43.85 in Maldives, a difference of 2.07.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 164th of 181 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Maldives Difference Ahead
2000s 45.92 0 45.92 Chad
2010s 45.92 43.85 2.07 Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Chad or Maldives?
Chad, at 45.92 against 43.85 in Maldives as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Chad and Maldives?
2.07, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Maldives?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Chad and Maldives rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Chad ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.